Jenny Reardon and Kim Tallbear on DNA, Genomics, and Anthropology

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Micah's DNA

Micah’s DNA (Photo credit: micahb37)

by Matthew L.M. Fletcher (Turtle Talk)

Last year, Jenny Reardon and Kim Tallbear published “‘Your DNA is Our History’: Genomics, Anthropology, and the Construction of Whiteness as Property” in Current Anthropology. PDF here.

Important paper.

The abstract:

During the nineteenth century, the American School of Anthropology enfolded Native peoples into their histories, claiming knowledge about and artifacts of these cultures as their rightful inheritance and property. Drawing both on the Genographic Project and the recent struggles between Arizona State University and the Havasupai Tribe over the use of Havasupai DNA, in this essay we describe how similar enfoldments continue today—despite most contemporary human scientists’ explicit rejection of hierarchical ideas of race. We seek to bring greater clarity and visibility to these constitutive links between whiteness, property, and the human sciences in order that the fields of biological anthropology and population genetics might work to move toward their stated commitments to antiracism (a goal, we argue, that the fields’ antiracialism impedes). Specifically, we reflect on how these links can inform extralegal strategies to address tensions between U.S. and other indigenous peoples and genome scientists and their facilitators (ethicists, lawyers, and policy makers). We conclude by suggesting changes to scientific education and professional standards that might improve relations between indigenous peoples and those who study them, and we introduce mechanisms for networking between indigenous peoples, scholars, and policy makers concerned with expanding indigenous governance of science and technology.

 

Source: http://turtletalk.wordpress.com/2013/05/07/jenny-reardon-and-kim-tallbear-on-dna-genomics-and-anthropology/

Two Parts: Lost Daughters discuss the Child Catchers

Tags

, , , , , , ,

The Child Catchers: Rescue, Trafficking, and the New Gospel of Adoption by Kathryn Joyce

The Child Catchers: Rescue, Trafficking, and the New Gospel of Adoption by Kathryn Joyce

Thursday, May 16, 2013

The Lost Daughters Discuss The Child Catchers by Kathryn Joyce -DIscussion Series

Part One: http://www.thelostdaughters.com/2013/05/the-lost-daughters-discuss-child.html

Part Two: http://www.thelostdaughters.com/2013/05/the-lost-daughters-discuss-child_17.html

One of the understandings that gelled for me in reading this book is of just how
effective the pro-adoption movement has been in terms of propaganda. And it goes
well beyond the Christian community. I would guess that many people in the
general public subscribe to the idea that there are many children around the
world languishing in orphanages; therefore, it is natural to assume that
adoption is a good thing because it gets these children out of institutions and
into families. On the surface, that seems like a no-brainer. And certainly, many
of us who speak out against the current practices of adoption have encountered
the criticism that we are heartlessly uncaring towards “all those kids” stuck in
horrible orphanage conditions. Child Catchers does an effective job of
showing how the orphanages and the adoption [industry] are bedfellows. For
example, “In Cambodia, after adoptions were suspended, the number of infants in
orphanages plummeted almost immediately: an indication to adoption reformers
that the international adoption system and the revenue it generated was the only
reason many babies had been placed in institutions.” But how do we get
information like this out?…

This is a fantastic discussion that needs to be retweeted and shared! Lara/Trace

Murrawarri people declare independence from Australia

Reblogged from Deep Green Resistance News Service:

By Special Broadcasting Service

The Murrawarri Republic may be the world's newest country, but for locals it's been around for tens of thousands of years.

The Republic's boundaries cross over northern New South Wales and Queensland - covering about 81,000 square kilometres.

Key leaders including Fred Hooper say the push for independence follows many frustrating years of inaction and broken promises.

Read more… 248 more words

murrawarri  GREAT NEWS

Iran calls on int’l community to combat human trafficking

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Iran’s Deputy Ambassador to the UN Gholam-Hossein Dehqani

Iran’s Deputy Ambassador to the UN Gholam-Hossein Dehqani
Wed May 15, 2013

Iran has a 900-kilometer border with Afghanistan and has frequently been used as the main conduit for the smuggling of Afghan drugs to narcotics kingpins in Europe.

The Islamic Republic has spent more than USD 700 million to seal the borders and prevent the transit of narcotics destined for European, Arab and Central Asian countries.”

An Iranian UN envoy has called on the international community to take effective measures against different types of smuggling, particularly human trafficking. Addressing a UN General Assembly meeting on human trafficking in New York on May 14, Iran’s Deputy Ambassador to the world body Gholam-Hossein Dehqani underlined the necessity to support the victims of human trafficking, especially women and children.
He expressed Iran’s misgivings over the increasing number of people who fall prey to the international gangs involved in the smuggling of body organs.
Poverty, unemployment, discrimination, a lack of social and economic opportunities, and global financial crises are among the factors making individuals vulnerable to human trafficking, Dehqani said, urging the international community to address the issue.
He further stressed the responsibility of wealthy countries in that regard.
Elsewhere in his remarks, the top diplomat pointed to the measures adopted by Iran in fighting human trafficking, saying Iranian police have dismantled dozens of international human smuggling rings in recent months alone.
Iran is determined to fight drug trafficking, he underlined.
Iran has a 900-kilometer border with Afghanistan and has frequently been used as the main conduit for the smuggling of Afghan drugs to narcotics kingpins in Europe.
The Islamic Republic has spent more than USD 700 million to seal the borders and prevent the transit of narcotics destined for European, Arab and Central Asian countries.
The war on drug trade originating from Afghanistan has claimed the lives of nearly 4,000 Iranian police officers over the past 33 years.
YH/NN/HJL

Abstinence Education Teaches Rape Victims They’re Worthless, Dirty, And Filthy

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Elizabeth Smart Speaks About Overcoming Trauma

Elizabeth Smart Speaks About Overcoming Trauma (Photo credit: KOMUnews)

By Tara Culp-Ressler http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/05/06/1967591/elizabeth-smart-abstinence-ed/?mobile=nc

Elizabeth Smart became a household name after she was kidnapped from her home in Salt Lake City, UT at the age of 14 and held in captivity for nine months. She was forced into a polygamous marriage, tethered to a metal cable, and raped daily until she was rescued from her captors nine months later. Smart was recovered while she and her kidnappers were walking down a suburban street, leading many Americans who followed her story on the national news to wonder: Why didn’t she just run away as soon as she was brought outside?

Speaking to an audience at Johns Hopkins about issues of human trafficking and sexual violence, Smart recently offered an answer to that question. She explained that some human trafficking victims don’t run away because they feel worthless after being raped, particularly if they have been raised in conservative cultures that push abstinence-only education and emphasize sexual purity:

Smart said she “felt so dirty and so filthy” after she was raped by her captor, and she understands why someone wouldn’t run “because of that alone.”

Smart spoke at a Johns Hopkins human trafficking forum, saying she was raised in a religious household and recalled a school teacher who spoke once about abstinence and compared sex to chewing gum.

“I thought, ‘Oh, my gosh, I’m that chewed up piece of gum, nobody re-chews a piece of gum, you throw it away.’ And that’s how easy it is to feel like you no longer have worth, you no longer have value,” Smart said. “Why would it even be worth screaming out? Why would it even make a difference if you are rescued? Your life still has no value.”

Now in her mid-twenties, Smart runs a foundation to help educate children about sexual crimes. She now believes that children should grow up learning that “you will always have value and nothing can change that.”

Social psychologists and sexual abuse counselors agree that comprehensive sex education can help prevent sexual crimes. Teaching children about their bodies gives them the tools to describe acts of abuse without feeling as embarrassed or uncomfortable, and it also helps elevate their self-confidence and sense of bodily autonomy. A shame-based approach to genitalia and sexuality, on the other hand, sends kids the message that they can’t discuss or ask questions about any of those issues.

Nonethless, abstinence-only education programs have a long history of imparting harmful messages that shame youth about their sexuality instead of teaching them the facts they need to safeguard their health. A high school in West Virginia recently made national headlines after hosting a conservative religious speaker who allegedly told students “if you take birth control, your mother probably hates you” and “I could look at any one of you in the eyes right now and tell if you’re going to be promiscuous.” In Smart’s home state of Utah — which is home to a large religiously conservative Mormon community — sex education is currently mandated, but lawmakers have repeatedly pushed to weaken the state law and reinstate an abstinence-only curriculum.

Statement on the Documentary “Stuck”

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

The Board of Directors of PEAR would like to express some thoughts on the recently released documentary, Stuck, which purports to be an accurate depiction of the current problems with the international adoption process. The documentary shows compelling footage of adorable children in shabby orphanages around the world, and follows the plights of three families with their international adoptions.
Stuck is part of a larger publicity strategy by the Both Ends Burning campaign spearheaded by Craig Juntenen, which includes a national tour, petition drive, and a march in Washington, D.C., all ostensibly designed to increase the number of international adoptions.  Juntenen’s strategy proposes to accomplish this by petitioning the US government “to remove barriers to international adoption.”
While specific barriers are not mentioned, it is clear from the discussions in Stuck that the requirements set forth in The Hague Convention on the Protection of Children and Cooperation in Respect of Inter-Country Adoption, specifically with regards to the Principle of Subsidiarity, are targeted.  The Principle of Subsidiarity states that it is in the best interest of children to be raised by family or kin. If immediate family/kin is unable, or unavailable, domestic placement with a foster or adoptive family in the child’s own country and culture is the next best option. Finally, if neither of these alternatives is viable, then permanent placement with an appropriate family in another country through intercountry adoption is seen as an alternative.
PEAR’s members, comprised of all members of the adoption triad as well as those interested in adoption ethics, are of course deeply sympathetic to children in need. We believe that all children should grow up in loving families wherever possible.
However, PEAR strongly supports the safeguards provided by the Hague Convention rules and restrictions. We believe that Central Authority adherence to the Principle of Subsidiarity, for example, is in the best interest of children, birth families, and sending countries.  We are also very supportive of the Hague injunctions against infant trafficking, false promises, and other deceitful and coercive means used by many sending countries and their orphanages to unethically obtain children for the express purpose of international adoption.  Stuck turns the complex issue of international adoption into an extremely simplistic story that misleads and misinforms rather than offering meaningful solutions.
For example, Stuck claims that shutting down adoptions is the same as telling children that their lives don’t matter.  Where adoption is the only choice for a child, it should be allowed and encouraged.  But Stuck completely ignores the fact that other choices may exist, such as placing a child with extended family, neighbors, or friends.  The Ethiopian birth mother profiled in the film said she relinquished her daughter because “I got nothing to feed her.”  Encouraging international adoption at the expense of family preservation efforts is the same as telling children and their biological families that their lives don’t matter.
Stuck also shows a researcher stating that if international adoptions decrease, the rates of institutionalization of children around the world could increase.  It is difficult to prove this assertion, and there is compelling evidence to show that the opposite is in fact true.  Experiences in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Guatemala have shown that the demand for adoptable children created by international adoption has actually caused more children to become separated from their families due to trafficking, false promises of educational opportunities, and outright confiscation, with many of those children ending up in orphanages. This anecdotal evidence is supported by studies showing that when international adoption closes in a country or region, the number of institutionalized children decreases, particularly in orphanages that had opened solely to provide children for these adoptions. Evidence for this was particularly strong in Cambodia, Vietnam, Guatemala, and China. In fact, in a video conference last November, Ambassador Susan Jacobs alluded to these studies. (http://adoption.state.gov/about_us/conversation_with_america.php) She said, “And we have to be very careful of that. And what we did find out is when we closed adoptions in a number of countries, the orphanages emptied out.”
Stuck also claims that minor paperwork errors are a significant cause of international adoption delays.   An adoptive mother of a child from Vietnam profiled in the film describes a missing document that slowed down her child’s case.  But the movie avoids placing such issues into a larger context:  Adoptions from Vietnam were halted by the U.S. Department of State for multiple reasons. One was due to an overwhelming body of evidence showing that children were being trafficked; some were purchased from their birth mothers and re-sold to orphanages for lucrative adoptions.  Another was the use of corrupt facilitators, knowingly hired by U.S. agencies and sanctioned by Vietnamese officials, who oversaw the dispensation of licenses to these agencies.  Vietnam also failed to comply with their own laws and agreements to make the process more transparent and to explain where fees were going.
Similar findings about corrupt agencies, facilitators, lawyers, and government officials have been also found in Guatemala, Nepal, and Cambodia, which resulted in the closure of those programs.  Allegations and investigations about similar problems in other countries such as Ethiopia, China, and India have also occasioned extensive delays.
Paperwork necessities and delays, while annoying and often redundant, are not the real problem, as Stuck naively asserts. The real problem is lack of meaningful oversight of adoption programs around the world.  To sanction the removal of even the minimal safeguards that try to minimize or eradicate corruption in the costly international adoption process would likely cause more children to lose their original families, an increase in trafficking and other forms of corruption, and result in more children being “stuck” in government care when the programs inevitably collapse under fraud allegations and investigations.
As a last point, Stuck also willfully neglects the voices of those with the most at stake: international adoptees themselves, especially those older than the children shown in the film. Its adoptive-parent-centric stance limits not only its scope, but its credibility about the repercussion of the process on powerless and vulnerable adoptees.
PEAR recommends the following thoughtful perspectives on Stuck:


Ethics, Transparency, Support ~ What All Adoptions Deserve. http://www.pear-now.org/

“Stuck” and Slavery, living #adoption

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

Interracial adoption

Interracial adoption (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

This excellent blog post in from my friend VON at her blog THE LIFE OF VON:

Jeremy, an adopter, commented on the LGA Review of “Stuck”, a film I have not seen and am not likely to see Full disclosure, I am an adoptive parent. “The adoptees that have come out of the fog, the enlightened beings know and understand what is really going on and will do whatever it takes to stop it.” No argument that there’s some nasty stuff going on in IA. But to categorically call every adoptee that does not agree with you “unenlightened”? And a slave to boot?  LINK: Snake Oil: The LGA Review of the Film “Stuck” « Land of Gazillion Adoptees.

It is a long time since I wrote a post on the similarities between adoption and slavery and Jeremy has prompted me to do so. Thank you Jeremy for the reminder!

Before I begin on that, adoption is not a viewpoint, a situation in which we are enlightened or unenlightened. Adoption is for life. Adoption begins with the traumatic loss of our mother and it is traumatic whatever the circumstances and whatever happens next. Adoption is also a trauma when we go to live with strangers who act wrong, smell wrong, speak wrong and have nothing familiar or right about them because they are not our mother. It really is time these things did not need spelling out, particularly to adopters. I don’t wish to be picky, particularly with someone who has been courageous enough to comment at LGA but please note that interesting expression of Jeremy’s “a slave to boot” – perhaps it needs no further comment!

Best perhaps not to put in a search for the term as I just did! Any adoptee who has reached the point in their adopted life when they see adoption for what it is and it may take decades to reach that point, will not wish the same fate on any child.

Any sane adult who fully comprehends what is going on in transnational adoption will do whatever they can to stop it. Once the blinkers come off and international adoption is seen for what it really is, no moral adult could possibly engage in such a process.

Of course those who can, will campaign against it, speak out about it’s wrongs and try to stop another generation of children being made adoptees. 90% of the estimated 153 million ‘orphans’ have at least one parent! Time for the world to make attempts to keep those families together, to stop the poverty that often parts them and to stop the trade in orphans.

There are many, many ways to make it happen; some cheap, some expensive but all possible, feasible and ethical. So, to why slavery and adoption can legitimately be compared.

Go to our old friend Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery

The entry begins: Slavery is a system under which people are treated as property to be bought and sold, and are forced to work.[1] Slaves can be held against their will from the time of their capture, purchase or birth, and deprived of the right to leave, to refuse to work, or to demand compensation. Historically, slavery was institutionally recognized by many societies; in more recent times slavery has been outlawed in most societies but continues through the practices of debt bondage, indentured servitude, serfdom, domestic servants kept in captivity, certain adoptions in which children are forced to work as slaves, child soldiers, and forced marriage.[2] Slavery is illegal in every country in the world but there are still an estimated 27 million slaves worldwide; some opponents are hopeful that slavery can be eradicated by 2042.[3]

Let’s take that point by point for starters – Slavery is a system under which people are treated as property to be bought and sold, and are forced to work.

In adoption, children are bought with large sums of money which profit those who run the agencies, institutions and legal firms as well as individuals who get payouts, bribes, fees or whatever term they currently use for asking for payment. Adoptees are expected to take on an assigned role as the adopted child in a family; maybe to cure infertility, to complete a family, to be a trophy saved orphan or dozens of other pieces of work which the adopters decide upon without consultation or agreement.

Slaves can be held against their will from the time of their capture, purchase or birth, and deprived of the right to leave, to refuse to work, or to demand compensation.

Adoptees have no choice about their adoption usually. If they are old enough they are often coerced, bribed, tricked or in other ways convinced that adoption is for their benefit, often deceived as to it’s real meaning and it’s permanence and finality. The adopted life is forever. It is a rare adoptee who has an adoption annulled; my own State only allows it if there is proven abuse – that is abuse recognised in law. I have never heard of an adoptee receiving compensation, other than in being the beneficiary of a will.

Some might argue that adoption itself is compensation for being saved from a life of poverty, illegitimacy, lack of education etc. Time and again we have seen how these arguments do not hold water. Adopters divorce, get sacked, refuse education, do not complete procedures for citizenship, abuse, murder, torture or provide dysfunctional family units. Illegitimacy has a way of following us in life – once a bastard always a bastard in my experience!

Historically, slavery was institutionally recognized by many societies; in more recent times slavery has been outlawed in most societies but continues through the practices of debt bondage, indentured servitude, serfdom, domestic servants kept in captivity, certain adoptions in which children are forced to work as slaves, child soldiers, and forced marriage. Adoption in some form is recognised by most societies. In some, adoption is a temporary arrangement within a family or a way of caring for genuinely orphaned children within the family. It is only in the Western world that adoption involves payments of large sums of money, placement of children with strangers and the loss of identity, biological family, culture, language and country. It has not been outlawed and in some countries continues to exist although at a declining rate. Perhaps one day it will be outlawed, as an inhumane practice, a callous act of cruelty and an unethical act and will be outlawed, banned and stopped.

Slavery is illegal in every country in the world but there are still an estimated 27 million slaves worldwide; some opponents are hopeful that slavery can be eradicated by 2042. Adoption is known in every country in the world and there are an estimated 153  million ‘orphans’ who need ‘saving’ by adoption. It is unknown how many adoptees there are in the world but the figure is in the millions. In America alone, it is thought to be around 10 million. In Australia during the era of ‘forced’ adoption the figure is around 250,000. Somewhere, someone will have toted up the estimated figures.

It seems it has never been considered important to keep a tally, a record or to document the history of adoptees. Following the Australian Government Inquiry into forced adoption a study was made of adoption and a survey undertaken which many adoptees took part in. It resulted in the first hard evidence about adoption and it’s effects. We will have to see what it produces.

Adoption will never be eradicated. Adoption is for life, there will always be another generation growing up, a generation with it’s own particular take on adoption and the adopted life. The new generation of young people are talking about becoming lawyers, attorneys and legal eagles so that they can learn to fight what they see as injustice, inhumanity and the powerful forces of adoptionland – the Big Adoption that profits, makes money and grows rich from the trade in children. They will need mentors, supporters and encouragement in their task and the older generation of adoptees will be there for them in whatever way they can to bring down the unethical, the profiteering and the inhumane.

Adoption in some form will always be needed. A conundrum, but there will always be some children who cannot or should not be raised by their biological parents. For them an alternate family may be best but let it be the very best. Let these children keep their identities, let them not be bought and sold and let them have all the support and help they need to deal with their unavoidable circumstances in their own country amongst their own people.

Any prospective adopted or adopter or indeed any adult, who continues to believe that adoption is ethical, carried out for the benefit of children, upholds the rights of children and is a humane practice, needs to get real, to watch films like “Mercy, Mercy” and to inform themselves with real information and facts instead of hype, advertising and propaganda, the products of Big Adoption which appear slick, convincing and genuine but to the informed eye are sickening, saccharine sweet, out of touch with reality and down right misleading, untruthful and coercive. Good luck!

(I added bold to certain points since this post was so articulate and on point…I was thinking of one adoptee in particular who was adopted then abandoned when the a-parents moved to a new state – then he was adopted into harsh conditions with a new adoptive family. Eventually he ran away… Sometimes the idea of adoption is an atrocity and indeed a form of slavery… Lara)

Another post to read: ORPHAN CRISIS: NOT! http://eagoodlife.wordpress.com/2013/05/04/orphan-crisis-not/

Valley Fever?

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

Coccidioidomycosis

Coccidioidomycosis (Photo credit: Pulmonary Pathology)

If you haven’t heard of valley fever, you’re not alone. Although cases in states like California are rising, public awareness is low and misdiagnoses from doctors are sadly high. The AP reported an 850 percent spike in cases across the country from 1998 to 2011, with California and Arizona being the worst states.

“The fever has hit California’s agricultural heartland particularly hard in recent years, with incidence dramatically increasing in 2010 and 2011,” wrote the AP’s Gosia Wozniacka. “The disease — which is prevalent in arid regions of the United States, Mexico, Central and South America — can be contracted by simply breathing in fungus-laced spores from dust disturbed by wind as well as human or animal activity.”

Why have things gotten so bad? “The fungus is sensitive to environmental changes, experts say, and a hotter, drier climate has increased dust carrying the spores,” wrote Wozniacka.

Valley fever can have a host of symptoms and is painful, debilitating and sometimes deadly. It sometimes starts with flu-like symptoms but “the infection can spread from the lungs to the brain, bones, skin, even eyes, leading to blindness, skin abscesses, lung failure, even death,” reported Wozniacka.

One of the groups most at risk are prison inmates. “Prisoners are vulnerable both because they are more likely to have chronic diseases like HIV and diabetes, and because they are often coming from outside the geographic area and have not developed immunity to the fungus,” wrote Tracy Wood from the Voice of OC for the Reporting on Health Collaborative. 

This reminds me of a story I wrote years ago about a new disease called BLASTO-mycosis – I am going to google it and share soon! Trace

 READ MORE HERE: http://www.alternet.org/environment/climate-change-fueling-deadly-disease-california-and-other-parched-states?akid=10427.116590.e6WpBh&rd=1&src=newsletter839254&t=3

SYMPTOMS: http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/valley-fever/DS00695/DSECTION=symptoms

NPR REPORT: http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2013/05/13/181880987/cases-of-mysterious-valley-fever-rise-in-american-southwest?ft=1&f=3

COMMENTS: spam or real?

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

WordPress

WordPress (Photo credit: Adriano Gasparri)

By Trace/Lara

I have tons of comments (30+ on some days) which hit the spam folder saying things like “how do I design a blog like this?” and “How do you find the information you include?” (some are gibberish while others are trying to sell us shit.)

Well, I have been an editor (for newspapers mostly) since 1996 and prior to that I was a writer-in-training and in pursuit of writing full-time. (I have unpublished stories and plays and poems to prove it, truly).

The articles I choose for this blog are either in the news or relevant to what I am researching. I love film and photography. I want to keep learning so I am posting what I learn about human trafficking and modern day slavery and the most important one to me: Adoption! (I am an adoptee) Other hot topics (for me) are Indian Country and news affecting all Native Americans.

I have two books out on adoption (a memoir One Small Sacrifice and an anthology Two Worlds: Lost Children of the Indian Adoption Projects) (and a poetry chapbook SLEEPS WITH KNIVES) and I do constantly read other blogger’s writing: to be smarter, more compassionate and understand other viewpoints.

AND I do teach a local course in blogging (not on WordPress but how to use Google Blogger). I have posted tips for my students that anyone can use: Visit: www.gccblogblog.blogspot.com. If you want to be good at blogging, keep reading the experts. I do.

And I am a publisher for other Native writers so that keeps my mind and hands extra busy doing BLUE HAND BOOKS.

Thanks for commenting on this blog – some are so wise and very appreciated, others were spam but some were questions I did want to answer….

PS: I have other blogs: www.splitfeathers.blogspot.com and www.bluehandbooks.blogspot.com and two Tumblr blogs and my website (which has a blog) www.tracedemeyer.com. I am a writer full-time so obviously I blog* and blog* and blog*… (*OK, maybe too much)

I am still learning, how about you?

Lara Hentz is Trace DeMeyer

_____________________________________________________

Blogs I read every time:

http://antiadoption.wordpress.com

http://writingmywrongs.com/

http://eagoodlife.wordpress.com/

http://www.adoption-truth.com/

http://transracialeyes.com/

http://justarezchick.wordpress.com/

slave traders(There are more blogs I follow listed in the right-hand column, too) (Yup, I am a really big reader)

Wade Davis: Dreams from endangered cultures

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Click here: 22:01 (audio)

With stunning photos and stories, National Geographic Explorer Wade Davis celebrates the extraordinary diversity of the world’s indigenous cultures, which are disappearing from the planet at an alarming rate.

April 29, 2013 by

In his role at the National Geographic, Wade Davis shares the belief that stories can change the world. In this moving and beautiful talk, he takes us on a series of journeys through the ethnosphere, merging tales and imagery of some of the world’s most endangered cultures.

When we were born, there were 6000 languages spoken throughout the world. Today, probably about half of those are no longer taught or uttered to babies. With the death of a tribal elder somewhere in the world every two weeks, one wonders how many languages are becoming extinct. Language is an important marker of loss of cultural habits, serving as a vehicle through which the soul of its people becomes intertwined with the material world.

Many still view the loss of indigenous people’s behaviours as a positive change in the development of the world. Davis challenges this notion. Looking back we will view the twenty first century as a time when people sat idly by and watched as people disappeared off the earth. Genocide is universally condemned, yet ethnicide; the death of a group’s way of life, is ignored or even celebrated. Our way of living is just one model of reality of life.

Davis’ stories remind us that there’s something different out there. The stunning mountains of Tibet serve as a crude face over the history of political domination in a land where 6000 sacred monuments were torn apart and it’s people were imprisoned for daring to question the status quo. A young kid from the Andes may view a mountain as an Apu spirit, ready to direct his destiny, giving him a profoundly different viewpoint on it from a child in Montana who sees a mountain as a place to be mined. The Kogi people of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta in Northern Columbia are ruled by a ritual priesthood with an extraordinary training program; the acolytes are taken away from their families at the age of three or four and sequestered in completely dark stone huts at the base of a glacier for eighteen years. After this time, they witness their first sunrise rolling over the hills and everything they have learned in abstract is reaffirmed.

Davis’ talk is full of photographs and stories from other groups; the warriors in the Kaisut desert in Northern Kenya, the Penan in the forests of Borneo. He asks the question; do we want to live in a monochromatic, monotonous world? Or how about we look to these indigenous people, nurture their cultures, learn about them and embrace a world of polychromatic possibility.

‘The Gilded Age’ Statistics Corporations Don’t Want Workers, or Anyone, to See

Tags

, , , , , , ,

‘The Gilded Age’ Statistics Corporations Don’t Want Workers, or Anyone, to See | Common Dreams.

If there’s one thing about what many are calling the “The New Gilded Age,” it’s that well-known corporations—not to mention less well-known, but extremely powerful ones—will fight extremely hard to keep secret just how lopsided the economic disparities have become in recent decades between low-paid workers in the society and the executive and ruling class that have reaped the words of a globalized, top-heavy economy.

In but one example, the CEO of JC Penny in 2011 made 1,795 times the amount of money as the average paid worker at the retail chain. Overall, the CEO-to-worker gap is up nearly 20 percent since 2009. What the numbers show, once again, is that in the US economy, some workers are more equal than others.

Adoptive parents petition to change ICWA

Tags

, , , , , , ,

This October 2011 photo shows Veronica trick-or-treating in Charleston, S.C. The U.S. Supreme Court on April 15 heard a challenge to the longstanding federal law on the adoption of Native American children, with several states, tribes and children’s welfare groups lining up to support the current rules. The case involves a South Carolina couple fighting to adopt Veronica, who, after a court battle, was returned to her biological Cherokee father in Oklahoma. ASSOCIATED PRESS

This October 2011 photo shows Veronica trick-or-treating in Charleston, S.C. The U.S. Supreme Court on April 15 heard a challenge to the longstanding federal law on the adoption of Native American children, with several states, tribes and children’s welfare groups lining up to support the current rules. The case involves a South Carolina couple fighting to adopt Veronica, who, after a court battle, was returned to her biological Cherokee father in Oklahoma.
TULSA, Okla. (AP) – After 18 happy months in his Owasso home, Ross Harp’s foster son was taken away for just one reason, Harp said.“We’re white, and the baby wasn’t,” he said. “How is that not racist?”Hoping to change the Indian Child Welfare Act, Harp and several other advocates delivered a petition on April 17 to U.S. Rep. Jim Bridenstine’s office in Tulsa.Passed in 1978, the federal law gives a tribe the right to intervene when an Indian child is placed in the custody of a non-Indian family.

“If there was an African-American Child Welfare Act,” Harp said, “or an Asian Child Welfare Act, everybody would be making a fuss. But because it’s happening to Indian children, nobody cares.”

With 23,000 names from across the country, including more than 1,000 from Oklahoma, the petition was inspired by the Baby Veronica case, which was heard by the U.S. Supreme Court a day earlier.

Veronica spent the first two years of her life in South Carolina with a non-Native American couple who was trying to adopt her.

But the Cherokee Nation intervened on behalf of her biological father, Dusten Brown, who’s a tribal citizen.

Now 3, the girl lives with Brown in Nowata. But her adoptive parents in South Carolina still hope to win her back.

“It’s not just Baby Veronica,” Dawn Ferrill, a foster parent who circulated the petition in Oklahoma, said. “It’s happening over and over again.”

The Supreme Court will decide Veronica’s case this summer. But either way, Ferrill hopes to see Congress change the ICWA.

First, the “best interests of the child” should be considered before deciding custody, she said. And a birth mother or father should be allowed to choose an adoptive family regardless of their descent, she said.

Cherokee Nation officials consider both proposed changes unnecessary.

The law already takes into consideration the “best interests” of the child and even the wishes of the birth parents, said Chrissi Nimmo, a CN assistant attorney general.

But the law also protects tribal sovereignty, giving the CN jurisdiction over its own children, she said.

Custody battles erupt when judges, adoption agencies and attorneys don’t follow the guidelines, Nimmo said.

“The way to avoid this situation,” she said, “is to fully comply” the ICWA “from the beginning of the case.”

But Ken Navarro, who signed and helped deliver the petition, said that as now interpreted, the act puts the interests of the tribe ahead of what’s best for the child.

Navarro ultimately won the right to adopt a 2-year-old boy but only after he briefly lost custody and fought a lengthy court battle with the CN, he said.

“It’s all very traumatic, especially for the child,” he said. “And for what?”

Aaron Huey: America’s native prisoners of war

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Aaron Huey speaks at TEDxDU

Aaron Huey speaks at TEDxDU (Photo credit: University of Denver)

15:27 http://video.ted.com/talk/podcast/2010X/None/AaronHuey_2010X.mp4

Aaron Huey’s effort to photograph poverty in America led him to the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, where the struggle of the native Lakota people — appalling, and largely ignored — compelled him to refocus. Five years of work later, his haunting photos intertwine with a shocking history lesson in this bold, courageous talk. (Filmed at TEDxDU.)

Slavery must be recognised in all its guises

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Sex trafficking is the only human rights abuse that gets proper attention – yet slavery is slavery, no matter what form it takes

MDG slavery in all its guises

A jewellery exhibition in Kolkata, India, 2010. From bracelets to biofuels, it is almost impossible for consumers not to be complicit in slavery. Photograph: Parth Sanyal/Reuters

Five years ago, I became the UN’s first special rapporteur on contemporary forms of slavery. Since then, I have been asked time and again by government officials, businesspeople and NGOs not to use the word “slavery” at all. I have been asked to change the name of my mandate and not speak out about what I have seen. They have asked me to use other words instead – ones that don’t carry the same meanings or implications.

Yet what other word describes people who have been beaten mercilessly, shut indoors, made to work without pay, sexually abused, poorly fed and threatened with more abuse against themselves and their family if they attempt to leave? This is not just violence or exploitation. What describes the situation in which a mother has no right over her child, or a father is forced to put down his own life – and those of his family – as collateral, working for nothing to try to repay a debt that will never go away? These are the forms of slavery that exist today.

Millions of people live in some form of enslavement. The exact numbers are impossible to calculate. Modern slavery is one of the most powerful criminal industries (pdf), and it is because of our collective silence and refusal to acknowledge its existence that it thrives and transforms itself into new forms year after year. By not speaking out, we are helping to perpetuate an industry that strips millions of their humanity and rights.

Slavery did not end when it was legally abolished. Instead, it is flourishing, extending its tentacles into every corner of the planet.

READ MORE: http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/poverty-matters/2013/apr/26/slavery-recognised-all-guises

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,701 other followers